4 Problems with Michael Porter's 5 Forces (63)

This week’s podcast is on the well-known 5 Forces framework by Michael Porter. I go through some of its limitations and where I think it works best.You can listen to this podcast here or at iTunes, Google Podcasts and Himalaya.Michael Porter's 5 Forces:Bargaining power of suppliersBargaining power of buyersThreat of SubstitutesBarriers to entry / threat of potential entrantsDegree of existing competitive rivalryRole of complements?My 4 problems with this are:It doesn’t work for dynamic and non-classical strategy terrains.It doesn’t work for platforms and ecosystems.It doesn’t work with SMILE marathon dimensions, particularly innovation.The addition of complements doesn’t really cover the emergence of a connected, digital world.Related podcasts and articles are:4 Problems with Hamilton Helmer’s 7 Powers (Jeff’s Asia Tech Class – Podcast 62)From the Concept Library, concepts for this article are:5 ForcesInnovation4 Terrains and Strategies (BCG): Predictable vs. MalleableSMILE MarathonFrom the Company Library, companies for this article are:None———-I write and speak about digital China and Asia’s latest tech trends.I also run Jeff’s Asia Tech Class, a podcast and subscription newsletter on the strategies of China / Asia tech companies.This content (articles, podcasts, website info) is not investment advice. The information and opinions from me and any guests may be incorrect. The numbers and information may be wrong. The views expressed may no longer be relevant or accurate. Investing is risky. Do your own research.Support the show

Om Podcasten

A podcast by TechMoat Consulting on the strategies of the best digital companies in the US and China / Asia. Tech Strategy offers:-Deep dives into the strategies and business models of leading tech companies. -Lessons on important digital concepts.Lots more information available at Jefftowson.comTo marketers, I do not have podcast guests. This podcast is not investment advice. Me and any guests may get the numbers or information wrong. The views expressed may no longer be relevant. Investing is risky. Do your own research.