Fortifying Life Science Patents: Eligibility and Enablement
The life sciences are currently facing at least two major plagues in our patent world. The first is that many life science innovations have been deemed ineligible in terms of patentable subject matter. In other words, the courts and the patent office believe that the patent laws are not meant to protect these innovations. The second plague is that the courts believe that many life sciences patents are not enabled. In other words, they are not described in sufficient detail to enable one of skill in the art to make and use the invention.These subject matter eligibility and enablement plagues manifest in dreaded Section 101 and 112 rejections. In this month’s episode, Dr. Ashley Sloat, President and Director of Patent Strategy at Aurora, leads a discussion, along with our all star patent panel, delving deeply into these rejections and, in the interest of avoiding a podcast 101 rejection, provides some very practical application tips that will help to fortify your life science patent applications. Ashley is also joined today by our always exceptional group of IP experts including:⦿ Kristen Hansen, Patent Strategist at Aurora⦿ Daniel Wright, Patent Strategist⦿ David Jackrel, President of Jackrel Consulting ⦿ Shelley Couturier, Patent Strategist and Search Specialist⦿ David Cohen, Principal at Cohen Sciences⦿ Amy Fiene, Patent attorney at Vancott and adjunct professor at BYU⦿ Steve Stupp, Partner at Stupp Associates, LLC. ** Resources **⦿ Show Notes⦿ Slides⦿ The Death of the Genus Claim ⦿ Final office action rejection frequency for life science patents ⦿ Examiner statistics (not an endorsement)** Follow Aurora Consulting **⦿ Home⦿ Twitter⦿ LinkedIn⦿ Facebook⦿ InstagramAnd as always, thanks for listening! ---Note: The contents of this podcast do not constitute legal advice.